Monday, 27 February 2017

On Mass Immigration and Environmentalism

I would consider myself to be an environmentalist. I know the term has become highly tainted as of late, and I would be lying if I said I didn't have deep criticisms towards many elements of the modern environmentalist movement, but I use the term to describe myself none the less as few satisfying alternative terms exist. I certainly believe in the preservation and indeed expansion of wilderness and natural environments as far as is practical. Whilst I have my doubts about the theory of anthropocentric climate change, I do still think it is entirely sensible we keep air, water and land pollution to a bare minimum and we should always be looking for cleaner, more efficient and sustainable energy sources. I think modern agricultural practices are highly destructive and should be completely overhauled in favour of a more permacultural system. But fundamentally I believe mankind should once again view himself as an integral part of nature, always striving work with her, not against her, a view strongly inspired by the works of Henry David Thoreau, John Muir and Edward Abbey. A view that I find is increasingly at odds with the modern, 'UN approved' environmentalist model, which would seemingly prefer to herd humans into cities and fence off the natural world entirely, but that's another criticism for another day.

The subject I wish to talk about here is a common cognitive dissonance I see with many self proclaimed environmentalists today. It has surely not escaped the attention of most that a significant majority of modern environmentalists are dyed in the wool left wingers. Although environmentalism in and of itself should be considered politically neutral, in recent decades it has been almost entirely co-opted by the left and invariably goes hand in hand with other common leftist talking points, anti-capitalism, social justice, social welfare, anti-racism, feminism, gay rights, multiculturalism and pro-immigration. And it is that last point where I see the glaring contradiction. I happened to be reading through the 2015 manifesto of the Green Party the other day out of curiosity, their immigration policy in particular caught my attention. Effectively they are in favour of lifting most of the current restrictions on immigration into the United Kingdom, a policy that would no doubt attract vastly greater numbers of migrants to our shores (and the numbers are high as they stand already). Now I find it utterly baffling how anybody purporting to care about the environment could ever advocate for such a policy. Folks, mass immigration is terrible for the environment of the host nation.

It's very simple really, more immigration means more people, and more people means we have to destroy green spaces to build more homes and amenities. It means we have to generate more energy, extract and import more resources. It means more vehicles on the road, and in small, already highly populated European countries such as Britain, it means denser traffic patterns, more gridlock, further exacerbating the air pollution problem. It means we have to intensify agriculture to keep up with food demands, which harms local insect ecology and further degrades the soil, or it means we have rely ever more on food imports from abroad. It means more waste in the landfills, more litter on the streets, in our countryside, coastlines and waterways. And what I find particularly galling about this, is that these same environmentalists are well aware of the highly destructive effects overpopulation has upon the environment, and yet here they are, advocating for policies that will directly cause overpopulation. In the case of my own nation, Britain, we are already one the most densely populated countries in Europe. We have a housing shortage and will need to build somewhere in the region of 250,000 new homes every year to accommodate the rising population, a population rise almost entirely attributed to immigration. We have already long surpassed our ability to be self sufficient in food production and now have to import over a quarter of our food, a figure that will only rise as the population increases and more of our arable land must be given over for housing. Mass immigration will in the long run turn much our once green and pleasant land into a miserable, overpopulated and polluted, concrete jungle. But still, the liberal environmentalist balks at the very suggestion we should ever close the doors on immigration.

Edward Abbey expressed similar sentiments in his later works, including an excellent short excellent essay, "Immigration and Liberal Taboos". He was viciously castigated for it by the leftist elements of the environmentalist movement during his time, some even calling him a "racist". So where does this cognitive dissonance come from? I suspect many of the liberal environmentalists are little more than virtue signallers, naively adopting all the popular leftist viewpoints, going along to get along but never actually sitting down and thinking about what they truly believe in. I'd like to think some of the more thoughtful and intelligent ones who do truly care about the environment, would eventually see when presented with the facts how undesirable mass immigration is for their cause, but rarely are they ever presented with the full facts from authority. So what of these so called 'environmentalists' in positions of power and authority, the leaders of the various 'green' parties, and other left leaning environmental organisations? What is their excuse for advocating a policy as environmentally destructive as mass migration? My argument would be that they do not care about the environment. They are wolves in sheep's clothing, using environmentalism as a front to garner popular support, but ultimately they are pursuing their own broader agendas that have little to do with saving the natural environment and everything to do with controlling people. They are not be trusted and I call upon all true environmentalists to reject them entirely, particularly any environmental organisations seeking political power. If you really want to help the environment, then do so on an individual and local community basis. Volunteer with a local wildlife reserve, plant trees, restore habitats. Reduce your reliance on big government, the energy industry and big agribusiness by learning about agrarianism, permaculture, homesteading and survivalism. If you have the facilities and capability, grow, forage and hunt your own food, generate your own energy using solar or wind power. Encourage your local community to do the same, create community gardens, start seed circles, farmers markets and share surplus food with your friends and family. And just to round of this post nicely, don't be afraid to demand stronger immigration controls.


Thursday, 9 February 2017

Megaliths in North Wales.

I have always had a fascination with prehistoric peoples and civilisations of Northern and Western Europe, but especially the megalithic structures they built. My late father was a native of Orkney, an archipelago just off the north coast of Scotland, a place with a deep and rich history stretching back thousands of years. I have very fond memories of the first time I visited Orkney, I must have been around 8 years old at the time and I loved the place the second I set foot off the ferry. It's rugged landscapes and wild coastline dotted with countless hidden coves, caves, rock pools and jagged cliffs perfect for climbing, a true paradise for an adventurous and imaginative young boy. It was during this trip that I also encountered for the first time, an ancient stone circle called the Ring of Brodgar. This was the first megalithic site I had ever visited and I have been captivated by the subject ever since. I now always make an effort on my trips and holidays, to seek out and visit at least a few local ancient and megalithic sites.

Last summer I visited Snowdonia national park in North Wales. It is a truly stunning corner of the British Isles and well worth a visit. And yes, you guessed it, I had the Ordinance Survey maps out in search of ancient sites. And there are a lot of them in North Wales, many don't even have names, are in remote locations far from any roads and difficult to find without good navigational skills. Thus, I was only able to visit and photograph handful of sites during my short stay.

Bedd Gorfal ring cairn

You'll need a map and compass to find this one. A bronze age ring cairn, most likely marking a burial. It's small, only a few metres in diameter and the standing stones are no taller than a meter. There is an indent in the ground at the centre of the circle which is possibly an indication that somebody has attempted to dig the site at some point.

Unnamed ring cairn

One of a pair of ring cairns, high in the hills above Harlech, with stunning views off the Cardigan Bay. Less than a mile north from Bedd Gorfal and very similar in size and characteristics, probably of the same era. A short walk to the east, atop a hill, lies the remaining earthworks of an Iron Age hill fort known as Moel Goedog, pictured below.

Below, the two ring ditches and ramparts of the fort are clearly visible.

Unnamed Stone Circle

We found this rather impressive henge entirely by accident. Whilst taking a drive through the mountains, we glimpsed it from the road and stopped to have look. It was a good 30ft in diameter and the stones themselves ranged between 6 - 8ft. Other than that I know next to nothing about the site, and have been unable to find any information. If you recognise this site and know anything about it, don't hesitate to contact me.

Lligwy Burial Chamber 

This Neolithic burial chamber, located on the island of Anglesey, is impressive to say the least, a 'megalith' in every sense of the word. The enormous capstone is estimated to weigh over 30 tons, the supporting ring of stones are in fact partially buried and stand over 6ft in height meaning the structure would have appeared twice it's current height. How ancient man was able to construct this megalith remains a mystery, but it is undoubtedly a phenomenal feat of Neolithic engineering.

Excavations carried out in 1909 revealed remains of up to 30 bodies, along with both Neolithic and early Bronze Age pottery. Evidence of rainfall erosion on the capstone suggests this burial chamber was not covered by a cairn (i.e covered with a mound of soil), which would make this structure a dolmen.

A short distance to the north are the foundational remains of an Iron Age settlement called Din Lligwy.

Bryn Celli Ddu

Probably one of the finest chambered cairns in Wales. Located on Anglesey and very similar in style to Maeshowe in Orkney, though more crude in it's construction, it was built around 2000bc, during the Neolithic on an older, existing henge, which itself appears to have been built on a late Mesolithic site of unknown purpose. Numerous human remains, including evidence of cremations have been discovered within the burial chamber. Like Maeshowe in Orkney and Newgrange in Ireland, Bryn Celli Ddu is aligned with the Summer Solstice, allowing the light of the sunrise to enter the passage and flood the interior of the burial chamber.

To the rear of the mound, you will find an interesting standing stone, known as the "Pattern Stone", replete with serpentine and spiral carvings. This stone is thought to be part of the original henge. The stone at the site is a replica, the real one currently resides in the National Museum of Wales.

Another intriguing standing stone can be found inside the burial chamber. A smooth, rounded pillar made of blueschist rock, standing guard over the chamber at a statuesque 6ft 6. It's significance is unknown, it is possible that it was part of the original henge, like the Pattern Stone.

The view from inside.

Dyffryn Ardudwy Burial Chambers

Possibly two of the oldest examples of portal dolmens in the British Isles, dated to almost 4000bc. Thought to originally have been covered by a large cairn of stones. They are referred to as "tombs", though it would appear that subsequent excavations have not turned up any evidence of human remains. Other finds however include numerous pieces of deliberately broken pottery from the Neolithic and Bronze Age, a stone pendant and two polished stone plaques, made from local Mynydd Rhiw stone.

This style of tomb or dolmen construction, and indeed most of the other megalithic structures I have shown here, are commonly seen throughout not only Britain and Ireland, but also Scandinavia, France and the Iberian peninsula, lending further credence to the hypothesis of a common, neolithic culture or civilisation spanning much of the Atlantic regions of Western and Northern Europe.


Wednesday, 25 January 2017

Trump; Ban on all migrants from seven Muslim nations.

"The president is also expected to take action over the next few days to temporarily ban immigration from Muslim countries deemed a 'threat to national security' - namely Syria, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Sudan, and Somalia."
My only gripe with this is, why are Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Pakistan not included? But what a refreshing sight it is to see an elected representative making good on their campaign promises. This is a very positive move that I think even the most ardent mass-immigration, pro-multicultural advocates will find difficult to criticise (though I am sure they will pull out all the mental gymnastics to try). Like it or not, we [the West] are at war with militant Islam, and militant Islam is at war with us. The countries cited here are well known for harbouring significant numbers of people who are utterly hostile towards Western civilisation and have made it very clear that they mean to do us harm. Yes, I know they are not all like that, but we simply do not have the capability to vet and filter out the good from the bad. From a purely pragmatic point of view, allowing migration from these nations as they currently stand, is an unacceptable risk and something every Western nation should have put a stop to years ago.

Willingly allowing hostile cultures and ideological enemies into your own lands is insanity and something unprecedented in history. We did not allow immigrants from the Axis Powers in World War Two for very good reason. All it achieves in the long term is the establishment of a fifth column ready to wreck havoc inside our walls. We are beginning to see the fruits of this here in Europe and the recent terrorist atrocities in France, Germany, Belgium, the Muslim sex attacks in Cologne, Northern England and Sweden etc are just the start. Our feckless governments, egged on by clueless, champagne socialists and liberal idealists, have brought a ticking time bomb into our countries, and it is going to be very, very difficult to reverse. America still has a chance to prevent this in their own borders and it would appear that President Trump is take the necessary steps to do just that.


Friday, 20 January 2017

China to teach masculinity to boys. Take note, Western world.

 "A new school textbook that aims to teach boys how to be "masculine" men has been released. Called "Little Men," the book covers the differences between boys and girls, the importance of the father-son relationship as well as the importance of interacting with nature and managing money."

It's not often I find myself praising the Chinese establishment, but in this case I believe they are spot on. It is unfortunate that the state now feels it must step in to do a job that fathers should be doing, but I think it is a positive move, none-the-less. I hope the policy is successful for the Chinese.

 "According to Tiantian Zheng, a professor of anthropology at State University of New York at Cortland, the issue of "masculinity" and the upbringing of boys is being treated as a priority at state level educational policy."

Unfortunately for us, the Western world is moving in precisely the opposite direction. Masculinity is now demonised at almost every level of the establishment, from education, academia and popular culture, right up to even the highest levels of government in come countries (I'm looking at you, Sweden).

From a very young age, Western boys go into an overwhelmingly female dominated, school system, where they are effectively forced to repress their natural, boyish tendencies by women teachers who don't understand or know how to handle such behaviour. Those who don't conform are often labelled with bullshit 'disorders' such as ADHD, a tag that condemns perfectly healthy boys to a life of believing there is something wrong with them, damages the self esteem and can stunt their drive for success. And don't even get me started on the harmful, mind bending ADHD drugs so many are placed on.

After school, many boys will go to college and university, where they will be fed typical feminist rhetoric, that masculinity is not in fact something absolutely essential for upholding the very foundations of civilisation, but something toxic and destructive that must be abolished. And popular culture echoes the exact same rhetoric.

And thus we now have young 'men' coming into the real world who are frankly not even worthy of the title. In my own generation, I see so many males in their late 20s, early 30s, an age at which they should be blossoming into full maturity, who possess virtually no masculine qualities and are utterly useless. They have no practical skills, they don't know how to use tools, how to build or fix things nor do they even have the inclination to learn these skills when the need arises, they just wallow in learned helplessness. They lack gumption and initiative, and then wonder why they can't find a good job. And I fear these traits will be even more present in the generations below me.

If this decline is not halted and reversed, our civilisation WILL face severe problems in the not too distant future. A society lacking in strong, masculine men, will become stagnant, stunted and weak. It will also be easily conquered by more masculine civilisations, the most clear and present danger in that respect, would be Islam. We in the West cannot wait for the state to step in, like the Chinese. The burden of responsibility is on all men who still retain their masculinity. Fathers, brothers, uncles, cousins etc, we must ensure, now more than ever, that the young boys in our lives are once again instilled with masculine values and grow up to become good, strong, confident, independent and resourceful men.

Thursday, 19 January 2017

Millennial Woes and the state of free speech in Britain.

Some of those in the neo-reactionary movement might be aware of a Scottish vlogger known as, Millennial Woes. He has become a somewhat popular figure within the alt-right in recent years, his political views are unashamedly racialist, nationalist and reactionary. I myself have been a subscriber to his channel for a just over a year, and whilst some of his political stances may be a bitter pill to swallow, his videos are none the less highly informative, insightful and thought provoking. None of his content as far I can see, could be considered a breach of any of the UK's draconian 'hate speech' laws. He is always meticulously careful about what he says, and has made it clear numerous times that he is absolutely against violence of any form.

His growing status has inevitably attracted the ire of anti-fascist groups and the left wing media. Back in 2015, Nick Lowles (a British anti-fascist campaigner and leader of a far-left, multiculti, circle jerk known as 'Hope not Hate'), issued a Twitter post urging people to come forward and reveal the identity of Millennial Woes, in a clear and obvious attempt to intimate him into silence. Nothing as far as I know came of this. Then in November of 2016, MW was invited to speak at the now infamous National Policy Institute conference in the US, alongside fellow alt-righter, Richard Spencer. A left wing Scottish tabloid, The Daily Record, discovered this and penned an article demanding that this "mystery Scottish racist's" identity be revealed. The article itself is absolute trash journalism, offering not a single counter argument to any of MW's stances, just a slew of buzzwords and ad-hominem attacks. Here is a link to that article. 

At some point over the Christmas period somebody did reveal his identity to the Daily Record (who appear to have a special vendetta against MW), they then gleefully plastered his identity, personal family details and even his location all over their front page. Not content with that, they even sent journalists to his home and when they couldn't make contact, they attempted to publicly shame him by interviewing his neighbours, asking them how they felt about this "vile, racist, xenophobic, bigot" living on their street, most of whome give typical, virtue signalling responses.

So as a result of all this, Millennial Woes has now fled Britain to an undisclosed location, presumably for his own personal safety, and the future of his presence on Youtube has been thrown into doubt. The disgusting and downright irresponsible actions of the Daily Record, have not only silenced somebody exercising their right to free speech, but have also potentially placed him and his family in very real danger. Any violent, Antifa thug can now easily find his home address. Or worse yet an Islamic radical (many of his videos have been highly critical towards Islam, and we know too well what can happen to those criticise the religion of peace).

So this is the state of free speech in Britain today. If you express any opinions that go against the established, liberal orthodoxy, you risk the far-left and the mainstream media doxxing you, sending journalists to harass and hound you in your own home, and maybe even attempt to have you arrested and prosecuted for 'hate speech' violations. This is not how things should be in a free and democratic society, we must be able to speak our minds without the fear of this kind of devious and underhanded retribution. If somebody is saying things you disagree with, then you should fight their ideas with debate. It is my view that those who seek to silence their opposition rather than engage them in debate, are effectively admitting (perhaps on a subconscious level at least) that they know their own ideas are bullshit, built on a sandy foundation of pie-in-the-sky idealism that will easily crumble away when held up to scrutiny.


Wednesday, 18 January 2017

Survivalism in Britain: The Challenges

This will be the first in a series of articles examining the state of prepping and survivalism in the United Kingdom as it currently stands. And what better place to start than looking from a poor man's perspective at some of the difficulties and restrictions us British survivalists often face in the pursuit of our goals.

I suppose I should preface this by saying that bog standard prepping is as simple affair in this country as anywhere else. Anybody, even of modest wealth and dwelling space can ensure that they have at least a few months worth of food and essential provisions stored away, they can assemble a bug-out-bag, get home bags etc, they can network with like minded friends and family and formulate plans in the event of an emergency. No problem with any of that. However, those of us who wish to take it up a notch and move towards a more full bore survivalist, off-grid homestead lifestyle, face a few more hurdles.

Property and Land

Probably the biggest obstacle aspiring survivalists face in Britain, is simply finding suitable and affordable property. Britain is a small but heavily populated country and we do not have an unlimited supply of land, thus purchasing land and property here is inevitably a more expensive affair than for many of our cousins in the USA, Canada or Australia, for example. To make matters worse, in recent years house price inflation has vastly outpaced wage inflation, with the national average house price now standing at approximately five times the average income. The ratio is even worse in some regions, rural property with land in much of Southern England, particularly in the densely populated counties surrounding London, is phenomenally expensive. Far beyond the reach of those of us with modest incomes, unless you want to be tied to a mortgage for the next twenty years of your life, which to me just doesn't jive with the survivalist/off-grid ethos.

The situation is not so bleak everywhere. In the North East of England, the Scottish Borders, the Highlands and in much of Wales and Northern Ireland, property prices have not seen such drastic increases and thus are much more within reach of the common man. These areas come with the added bonus of sparseness and maintain many wide open, wilderness spaces. Prospective survivalists would do well to consider setting up shop these regions.

Finding property or land is one thing, but what you are allowed to do with your land is another thing entirely. In general you have the right to grow food, collect water, raise livestock such as chickens,
ducks, etc, on any land you own without the involvement of any bureaucracy. Certain buildings can also can erected without planning permission, sheds, workshops, barns, greenhouses, poly tunnels and other utility buildings are usually fine. To build a dwelling however does in most cases require planning permission from your local council, and depending on the location, this can be a frustrating process. For example, to be granted permission to build even the most modest dwelling on designated agricultural land, you will generally be required to show that you will be using the land for agricultural purposes. This may not be too big of an issue for a survivalist, as they likely will be intending to grow crops and raise livestock on the land. Gaining permission to build on protected lands such as woodland, forest or national park land is even more difficult and as above, you will be required to demonstrate a good reason for wanting to build in such a location.

The planning regulations in Britain are unfortunately not at all geared towards accommodating the self build, off-grid or survivalist lifestyle. It is entirely possible to work within the system and get what we want, but it can be a long process that requires patience and dedication. Now I don't wish to turn this into a rant against the planning laws, I agree a certain amount of regulation is needed to protect our countryside from those who happily see it all concreted over and turned into a giant suburb, but it would certainly be nice if the process was liberalised for low impact, off-grid dwellings. Know however that there are other ways and means around all this bureaucracy for those who don't mind going a bit under the radar, I will probably touch upon this topic at a later date.

Huntin', Shootin', Fishin'

Game shooting and fishing are popular rural pursuits in this country. However it is not a simple case of grabbing your gun and heading off to the woods. As I have already mentioned, Britain is a small country, and as such the overwhelming majority of land is privately owned. This means that to lawfully hunt game will invariably require one to gain permission from the landowner. In my experience, most landowners are happy to allow responsible people to shoot on their land, and tossing a few rabbits and pheasants their way from time to time will help keep them sweet. I strongly recommend that any survivalists interested in hunting approach their local farmers and landowners and get some shooting permissions, and build up good relationships with them. Their friendship and co-operation could well be invaluable in a SHTF situation. Some survivalists and preppers have this naive idea that post-SHTF they will just swan into the countryside and hunt for food to their heart's content, but unless they happen to live in a very remote area, this could prove to be seriously problematic. Remember that the land will still be owned by somebody. Look at it from the landowner's perspective, would you feel comfortable in a SHTF/WROL world with a complete stranger on your property, armed with a firearm, crossbow, bow or other weapon? Probably not, and such a scenario could very easily lead to a nasty violent exchange. So it is vital in my opinion to seek shooting permissions well before any signs of trouble. 

I will note that in Scotland, there is a public right to shoot wildfowl on foreshore marshland. Certain areas of public foreshore can also be freely hunted in England and Wales, though some foreshore is privately owned. 

As with land, many of our inland waters, even some rivers, are privately owned. Thus permission must be sought from the owner if you wish to fish for game. There are countless clubs and syndicates across the country that will help facilitate this. For those who live near the coast, sea fishing is more or less unregulated. There is no requirement for a rod licence and anything caught by be taken and eaten. Spearfishing is also legal. 

Guns and Bearing Arms

It's no secret that Britain is not a particularly gun friendly state. Our ancient right to keep and bear arms, (first afforded to us under Common Law, re-affirmed by the Bill of Rights 1689, and later in Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England), has been steadily regulated into oblivion by successive governments over the past century and we are now left with very little in the way of "gun rights" and a public that largely fears the idea of private gun ownership. With that being said, it is however still entirely possible for private individuals to own certain types of firearms within the UK, and getting licenced is not as difficult as some might believe. I personally believe that every survivalist should have some means of defending themselves post-SHTF. If you are not willing to protect what you have worked so hard to build, then there is little point in prepping at all. I won't go into the mechanics of the licensing system here, but I will point out some things to consider before you decide to go down the route of legal gun ownership. 

Number one, being a licenced firearm owner will put you on the state's radar, so to speak. This can be an understandably uncomfortable prospect for a survivalist concerned their privacy and operational security. There is a fear in some British survival circles that in the event of SHTF, the authorities might attempt to seize registered firearms. I'm not so sure about this myself as I doubt they would have the logistics to achieve it, but it is certainly not beyond the realms of possibility. 

Secondly, the establishment for a number of decades now, has made it quite clear that they do not believe in the public owning firearms for self-protection. Whilst it can be lawful to defend yourself with a firearm you happen to possess, self-defence in and of itself is not considered an acceptable reason to be granted a firearm's licence. The only generally accepted reasons are, hunting, pest control, target shooting and collecting. To give any indication that you might want firearms for 'other' purposes could result in you being denied a licence, or your existing licence being revoked and your guns seized, so be careful.

I can't tell British survivalists whether they should or shouldn't own firearms, it's ultimately up to the individual to decide if it is worth their time and effort. For those who decide it is not worth it, there are alternatives. Air rifles up to 12ftlbs of energy and air pistols up to 6ftlbs are legal in England and Wales without a licence for anybody over the age of 18. Whilst these may not be suitable for defence purposes, they are an invaluable tool for hunting small game. Crossbows and bows of any strength can also be freely owned across the UK without a licence, however hunting with them is illegal. 

Public Attitudes 

If I was asked to define what a survivalist is, I would say at our most fundamental core, we are independent minded folk who are simple trying to take responsibility of our own destinies, as far as is humanly possible. We want to reduce our personal dependency on government, on big business, wage slavery, materialism, and live a more simple, agrarian lifestyle. Unfortunately, preppers and survivalists the world over (and Britain is by no means an exception) tend to have a less positive image in the public eye, thanks in no small part to the mainstream media. At best we are seen as eccentric oddballs, kooks and paranoid cranks, at worst we are seen dangerous 'extremists', even potential domestic terrorists.

Modern day British society is heavily urbanised with approximately 80% of the population living in towns or cities. The culture is heavily urban centric too and geared towards rampant consumerism. Many British people simply can't wrap their heads around the concept of survivalism. And why would they? They live in stable and wealthy nation, with all their provisions just a stone's throw away at their local supermarket, or shopping centre. They have a frankly delusional view that true hardship is a thing of the past and society will only continue to get better and better. I don't think they even entertain the thought that the party might one day come to end. All this can make it very difficult for a survivalist to connect with like minded individuals in urbanised areas. That's why I will always recommend moving to the countryside. Rural British folk tend to be much more amenable to survivalist practises and philosophy, indeed many themselves will be passionate gardeners, home growers, smallholders, homesteaders and permaculturalists themselves.  

Well folks, I hope this little essay has not painted too negative a picture of the UK, or detered any potential Britons interested in survivalism. Really, things are not that bad here in the grand scheme of things. Survivalists and preppers in every country face their own unique problems and challenges, and part of becoming a true survivalist is finding ways to adapt and overcome these challenges.


Monday, 16 January 2017

A Small Introduction

Hello folks. I don't see any reason to write a long, drawn out introduction, so here are just few bullet points about myself which will hopefully give people an idea of the kind of stuff I will put on this blog.
  • I am young, British man, in my mid/late 20s, living somewhere in rural England.
  • I'm an avid outdoorsman, very interested in prepping, survivalism, homesteading, permaculture and self-sufficiency.
  • I don't nail my colours to any political parties, but my views lie somewhere in the neo-reactionary sphere, with some libertarian/anarcho-capitalist leanings. 
  • Proudly Eurosceptic and part of the 27% of under 30s who voted to leave the EU. 
  • Love researching history, mythology, folklore and esoterica.
  • Increasingly dismayed by the decadence and nihilism infecting modern, mainstream society. 
  • Just trying to live a simple, agrarian lifestyle on a shoestring budget.
Well that's enough about me for now. I am totally new to the world of blogging so if some of my initial posts come across as a little clunky, I can only apologise. I look forward to exchanging ideas and hope at least a few people will derive some value and enjoyment from this blog. Thanks for looking.